After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are reviving these systems. Out of lie diagnosis tools analyzed at the edge to a program for confirming documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being included in asylum applications. This article explores just how these systems have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into pressured hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their very own capacity to work these devices and to go after their right for protection.
It also illustrates how these kinds of technologies happen to be embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of spread technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering them from being able to access the stations of proper protection. It further states that analyses of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in to the disciplinary www.ascella-llc.com/generated-post-2/ mechanisms of the technologies, by which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who are disciplined by their reliance on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also generate it difficult just for refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They may be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes all of them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their cases. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.
